“Welfare Took me From a Refugee To a Lawmaker” says Finland’s Parliament Member Nasima Razmyar.

A native of Afghanistan whose family fled to Finland when she was a child in 1992,Nasima Razmyar is the first Finnish parliamentarian with a refugee background and more generally, one of few with any immigrant background. As such, she is looked to as an inspiring figure towards greatness.

Nasima Razmyar, a member of Finnish parliament and an asylum recipient from Afghanistan,encountered a lot of ups and downs before getting to her present status . But she also wants to stay focused on what makes Finland a global beacon for women.

In an interview with Razmyar she discussed issues concerning the Status of Women.

What are your priorities in Parliament?

I was the first MP with a refugee background in Finland, so of course at the moment I’m being constantly being asked to take a stand on immigration issues since, like the rest of Europe, the refugee question is overwhelming Finland. But those are not the only issues I care about. We have to remember that [established] immigrants are also Finnish citizens who share the same concerns as the rest of the Finnish people, so we need to keep focusing on education, healthcare and other issues that are equally important to us all. My main priorities, which are reflected in the committees on which I serve, are education, the environment and housing.

How does your personal background shape those priorities?

Coming from Afghanistan, I know how bad the world can be. I know what war means and what it is like to live with instability. That makes me appreciate a lot of things about Finnish society, especially our welfare system, which I wish the rest of the world would copy. It’s about more than sharing [wealth and benefits] with people. Society can be very rich when everyone participates fully. Finland is small country of only 5 million inhabitants, so we cannot afford to diminish our capacity by leaving anyone out.

I’m a product of the welfare system and an example of why it works. When my family arrived from Afghanistan, we had nothing. Yet, thanks to the Finnish system, we received housing and other benefits. I enjoyed all the same opportunities as any child born in Finland and it enabled me to achieve the highest level of education and become a member of parliament.

However, this way of thinking is changing now and our welfare system has started to crumble. Society is beginning to think that it’s okay to leave some people behind. To me, this is a mistake and I hope I can help change the course. I believe it is important to keep our welfare system strong and not leave anyone behind.

What was it like when you and your family first arrived?

We were offered many tangible tools, like language classes, to help us integrate, but what we didn’t have was a warm welcome from society. There is no Finnish version of the “American dream” to facilitate integration. Here I believe it is relatively easy to become American, whereas in Finland, the immigrant label sticks with you for a long time, which makes things more difficult.

Finnish immigration policy is generally welcoming to asylum seekers, however, as in many European countries, recently there has been a rise of right-wing opposition to (and even attacks on) the current influx of refugees.

How influential are these anti-refugee groups? Do you believe that Finland is responding asylum claims appropriately? Was it right to introduce checkpoints at the border with Sweden in September? In your opinion, what would the ideal response look like?

The whole world should take more responsibility, especially the U.S., Australia, etc., and not leave Europe alone to shoulder the burden. In Europe, the pressure is so huge that I can understand the fears of policymakers who don’t know how to deal with this. In 2014, we had 3,000 asylum seekers and last year we had 33,000. That is a huge difference!

Of course we have to help people, but we also have to think through what happens when they come here to stay. Is our system equipped to provide the resources they need? What if it is not? That kind of discussion is understandably taking place all across Europe. The problem is that some countries are accepting responsibility for the refugees and others are not. It is not sustainable for E.U. countries to take different positions. It is problematic, for example, when Sweden fails and Budapest gloats saying “we told you not to do this.” Europe needs a common immigration policy; otherwise it will remain in chaos.

 

Culled From:Womensenews.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
Share on print

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
? Hi, how can we help?